← Back to case studies

Financial services

KYC Accelerated
with Document Analysis

The model was not the hard part. The hard part was designing a workflow where analysts can trust the output and can still overrule it, and that the regulator accepts.

Sector: Financial services Service: AI Strategy Sprint Duration: 4 months Year: 2025

Proof in numbers

−60%turnaround time per file
+35%quality score in sample audits
100%decisions with a human check
4months to production
0findings in the internal audit

AI in Europe

European brands already running AI in production.

Not my clients. Examples of what happens once AI moves past the pilot stage.

  • Sweden

    AI customer service assistant

  • Germany

    Fashion assistant for product advice

  • Investment firm

    AI strategy and use-case portfolio

  • Netherlands

    AI Trip Planner for travel planning

  • Germany

    Industrial Copilot for engineering

  • Enterprise retailer

    AI-driven vendor selection

  • Sweden

    AI DJ and personalized playlists

  • Germany

    Generative voice assistant in the car

  • International manufacturer

    AI roadmap and leadership

  • Netherlands

    Generative chatbot for customer queries

  • France

    Beauty Genius: personalized advice

  • Financial services firm

    KYC accelerated with AI document analysis

  • Germany

    Joule: copilot in business software

  • France

    Hopla: grocery shopping assistant

  • SaaS scale-up

    AI readiness assessment

  • Netherlands

    AI-driven payment optimization

  • Netherlands

    AI in medical imaging

  • Professional services firm

    Internal AI assistant for knowledge workers

Dave Willemstein, Independent AI Advisor
vertrouwen,
ervaring, impact ↓
Independent No vendor bias Senior only
20+ jaar ervaring
Focused on value
No hype
real impact

Situation

A financial services provider processed client onboarding largely by hand. Analysts read through extracts, financial statements, identity documents and UBO declarations to complete each file. Turnaround times kept growing, and quality varied by analyst and by week.

Challenge

AI support was the obvious answer, but KYC is a regulated process. Every automated step had to be explainable, reproducible and traceable to a human decision. A model that is right 95% of the time is not automatically usable in this domain: everything depends on what happens in the remaining 5%.

Approach

We started with the workflow, not the model. Which steps in handling a file are extraction (pulling facts out of a document) and which are judgment (weighing whether that fact represents a risk)? Only the extraction steps were in scope. For every extraction we set a confidence threshold: above it, the system proposes a value; below it, it goes to the analyst unfiltered.

Decision

The architecture was deliberately conservative: the system proposes, the analyst confirms. Every confirmation and every correction is logged, giving both an audit trail and a measurable quality loop. There is no step where a file is closed out without a human check.

Result

Turnaround time per file dropped 60%, mainly because analysts no longer had to search but only had to check. The quality score in sample audits rose 35%, because the system consistently surfaced every field instead of only the ones an analyst happened to think of. The internal audit raised no findings.

Next case

AI readiness assessment for a growth-stage scale-up

Uncertainty about where to start and what it actually takes to make AI land.

Read the case →

Ready for impact?

Let's discuss your case.

A no-obligation conversation about your challenge, the options, and the best next step.

30 min., no pitch deckBook a call →